Well, the Golf is old news now. Sabuk is learning how to drive using a clutch up around our hills. We hit a log while U-turning around and I had to fix some plastic parts by the bumper. Life goes on.
The baby sitter certainly gave Knuckle a trauma when she said what she was gonna do. But apparently she was kidding. Whatever her motivation, she did get Knuckle to do what she wanted him to do - I'm guessing about this. Knuckle, you can give us the details if it suits you. I don't really know if this event has anything to do with the POV about gays and how they will corrupt our innocent kids. How can one predict how things will go - whatever the sexual orientation? I don't follow the logic.
Yeah, it seems like you know what gay people will do to our kids because of their sexual preference. OK, I'm glad you know that. Are you saying you're going to do something about the rampant adoption of innocent kids by these gay molesters? Or is this about something else? I do understand your view. I just don't agree with it. But, we've been here a number of times before.
I watched "Temple Grandin" with Clair Danes yesterday. (She didn't actually come over and watch it with me. Isn't English clear?) Anyway, it pointed out how so-called, aberrant behavior can also become an asset. This autistic, awkward, socially-inept girl used her ability to focus on details that 'normal' people hadn't noticed for years about slaughtering cattle. She built a system that has become the standard of how this is done in a more humane manner. It was a good movie.
I am a friend of a family who has autism in their genes. I sometimes have trouble communicating because of the Temple Grandin fear and awkwardness in the air. But, the work that they do is so elegant and focused. The autistic conditions are what 'normal' people make fun of because they don't understand it. This was shown when the other college students and teachers re-acted when Temple built her 'hug' machine and kept it in her dorm room. It was considered aberrant (and even weirdly sexual) by the general public.
Just because hetero adoptive parents can cause bad situations is NOT IN ANY WAY justification to let gay adoptive parents have a conciliatory shot. thinking that they should resultantly be so entitled, is the type of thought process that is destroying this country
it's akin to thinking that just because your peers might be getting a government hand out, that entitles you to your share, as well. I don't buy that.
I asked 12 adoptees having hetero parents, only 3 were indifferent. the others were strongly opposed
Comments
The baby sitter certainly gave Knuckle a trauma when she said what she was gonna do. But apparently she was kidding. Whatever her motivation, she did get Knuckle to do what she wanted him to do - I'm guessing about this. Knuckle, you can give us the details if it suits you. I don't really know if this event has anything to do with the POV about gays and how they will corrupt our innocent kids. How can one predict how things will go - whatever the sexual orientation? I don't follow the logic.
I watched "Temple Grandin" with Clair Danes yesterday. (She didn't actually come over and watch it with me. Isn't English clear?)
Anyway, it pointed out how so-called, aberrant behavior can also become an asset. This autistic, awkward, socially-inept girl used her ability to focus on details that 'normal' people hadn't noticed for years about slaughtering cattle. She built a system that has become the standard of how this is done in a more humane manner. It was a good movie.
I am a friend of a family who has autism in their genes. I sometimes have trouble communicating because of the Temple Grandin fear and awkwardness in the air. But, the work that they do is so elegant and focused. The autistic conditions are what 'normal' people make fun of because they don't understand it. This was shown when the other college students and teachers re-acted when Temple built her 'hug' machine and kept it in her dorm room. It was considered aberrant (and even weirdly sexual) by the general public.
it's akin to thinking that just because your peers might be getting a government hand out, that entitles you to your share, as well. I don't buy that.
I asked 12 adoptees having hetero parents, only 3 were indifferent. the others were strongly opposed